1st 2nd base dating Chat secual jasmin
Canjth , 26 October 2006 (UTC)I concur with the flow of discussion here, but I respectfully suggest that the problem goes beyond mere cleanup to more fundamental questions about the encyclopedic nature of the article and the importance of the topic.I want to be respectful of the individual(s) who've worked on this page, but I suggest nominating the page for deletion entirely. Baseball metaphors for sex are an important part of English language culture in North America and Wikipedia needs an article about it.You don't need to be an expert to realize that this is such an infrequent occurrence that there's not a genuine name for it. It's like putting "donkey punch" or something up there. --Artdyke (talk) , 10 January 2011 (UTC) Is it necessary to have references in popular culture?It's a fairly common saying, that'd be like trying to reference "bling bling".Regarding the recent adding the "needing an expert tag", I don't think someone can be an "expert" on baseball metaphors for sex.It should be either removed, or replaced with an alternate tag.Your argument is on the line of 'if you're too dumb to know everything why should I tell you'.
My Page , 20 December 2007 (UTC) so that us foreign people can also understand what it means if we happen to run across them.The Woody Allen quotes are about thinking about baseball during sex. Thinking about baseball to prolong sexual activity has pretty much nothing to do with a metaphor about what stage you're at in your relationship.I already deleted it once, but it was reverted; I want to delete it again, but since someone apparently disagrees I figured I'd at least bring up the subject for discussion.Justin Eiler , 23 October 2006 (UTC) Elements that are made up should not be on a Wikipedia page, period.This article cannot be both a serious encyclocpedic entry on the topic and a comedy riff on it.--The reverend , 4 July 2006 (UTC) There is nothing wrong with this article.